Skip to main content

The Replicant Debate






With Blade Runner 2049 fast approaching and Harrison Ford returning to yet another of his most famous roles, an old debate is once again being refueled. Is Rick Deckard a replicant?


If you look to those responsible for creating this definitive piece of sci-fi, you'll get different answers. In the original book by Philip K. Dick (Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?) Deckard is human. Ridley Scott is convinced he's a replicant, whereas Harrison Ford argues that Deckard is human. Hampton Fancher, the original screenwriter would prefer the answer remain ambiguous. 


In the original cut of Blade Runner it was unclear as to whether he was or wasn't, however the Director's Cut and Final Cut - thanks to Ridley - indicate that he is. The evidence is still ambiguous in places, but it's there:

  • There's no mention of Deckard's life between stints as a Blade Runner, except for his failed marriage.
  • Deckard's apartment is full of photos, something replicants like to collect.
  • He doesn't answer Rachael when she asks if he passed the Voight-Kampff test.
  • Deckard's eyes glow like a replicant.
  • He somehow endures beatings from three different replicants without any visible sign of impairment.
  • Roy Batty knows his name without being told.
  • Using a metal pole, he manages to wound a replicant who (without injury) has just opened a hole in a wall with his head.
  • He climbed a building rapidly with two broken fingers.
  • Gaff (Edward James Olmos) tells Deckard: "You've done a man's job, sir!" And after Roy Batty expires, he not only lets Rachael live he let's them both leave.
Click here to see the Quora page that helped with the above evidence.

Here's my problem with the whole debate; what use is a replicant Blade Runner who isn't aware of what he is? Why would you want your hunter to think he's human? Replicants are stronger, faster and in some cases smarter than humans, surely you'd want Deckard aware of what he can do so he can be more efficient at his job. RoboCop, the Terminators, Major from Ghost in the Shell, Bishop from Aliens, even Data from Star Trek: The Next Generation, they are all aware of what they are and what they are capable of. And at the same time they are all learning to be more human. Whereas our veteran Blade Runner continually gets his arse kicked by almost every replicant he goes after. Leon (Brion James) would have killed Deckard if Rachael (Sean Young) hadn't shot him - using Deckard's gun. This all suggests to me that Deckard is human.



Now, with the sequel on the horizon there are new variables in the equation. There's 30 years between Blade Runner and 2049, but according to the first movie the lifespan of a Nexus 6 - the most advanced model - is 4 years. So if Deckard is a replicant, how is he still alive? Tyrell (Joe Turkel) told Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer) that there was no way to extend the life of a replicant. Also why has Deckard aged like a human? Surely he would remain the same or gradually break down like the other replicants. Is this the part where you tell me that Deckard is a special prototype or somehow unique?



There's little doubt that it's Deckard that has something Neander Wallace (Jared Leto) wants: "I had the lock, and he has the key." But Wallace could easily be talking about Rachel, she was the special prototype. Now as far as we know Sean Young won't be appearing in 2049, in this day and age it would be very difficult to conceal her involvement, but not impossible. Could it be possible that the numbers K finds carved in wood are in fact the date of her death, marking the place where she's buried? Maybe it's her body that Wallace wants, or maybe there's something buried with her.




In a recent interview, Ridley Scott claimed that 2049 would finally answer the question. However, director Denis Villeneuve insists that it'll remain ambiguous. It's interesting to note what Ryan Gosling said in a recent interview with Empire Magazine: "The world has become even more brutal. People are trying to survive. (K) discovers a mystery that makes him question his own identity, and Deckard is the only one who can answer those questions." Does this mean all Blade Runners are replicants? Or by re-igniting this old debate, are they just trying to generate interest in the new movie?



There's no denying the evidence that supports the claim that Rick Deckard is a replicant, and that most of it was added to the movie by Scott years after the initial release. The question we should be asking is; does it make sense? I find it interesting that Ridley Scott seems to be the only one involved in Blade Runner that thinks Deckard is a replicant. Harrison Ford thinks he's human, as do the original screenwriter and the author of the source material. I find myself agreeing with them, it just makes more sense to me. As I said before what use is a replicant Blade Runner who isn't aware of what he is and what he is capable of? Now I may be proven wrong in the next few months when Blade Runner 2049 hits cinemas. But as it stands, I'm convinced that Rick Deckard is very much human.



Where do you stand on this debate? Do you think Deckard is human or a replicant? Would you prefer that the whole thing remain ambiguous? Let us know by leaving a comment below or find us on Facebook and Twitter. Check out our reaction to the latest Blade Runner 2049 trailer here.

Blade Runner 2049 Trailer #2:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Snyder Cut | Wouldn't Be The First Time a Director Got a Second Chance

It seems that a fairly common occurrence amongst movies tied to Warner Bros. is the magical disappearing/reappearing director. Does that mean there's hope for the Snyder Cut? I certainly hope so!


Ever since Justice League hit cinemas in 2017 - possibly even before - fans have been calling for Zack Snyder's original vision to be released. Snyder famously faced issues regarding the darker tone and longer run times his movies were taking, especially after the negative response to 'Batman v Superman'. This of course led to rewrites of the superhero team-up movie, and certain plotlines established or teased in 'BvS' - including the epic Knightmare scene - being dropped. The director then left the production after the tragic death of his daughter. Joss Whedon was brought in by the studio to finish the movie, this included the completion of post production and some major reshoots, further altering the movie. All of which resulted in a movie that is drastically differen…

Dates for Phase 5 of the MCU may have been Leaked

After unveiling Phase 4 of the Marvel Cinematic Universe at Comic Con last month, it's believed that plans for Phase 5 will be announced at D23. But have some of the release dates may have already been leaked?



Charles Murphy (@_CharlesMurphy) - someone who is known for revealing accurate info - has tweeted possible release dates for two upcoming movies. According to Murphy (which "could be subject to change"), Black Panther 2 will arrive in cinemas on 18th February 2022, and will be followed by Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 on 6th May 2022. These dates are similar to the movies that preceded them, Black Panther was released on 13th February 2018 and GOTG Vol. 2 on 27th April 2017. Both movies had a lot of success in their respective slots, so it makes sense that Marvel would attempt to continue that success with future instalments. It has also been confirmed by James Gunn, that he won't be working on GOTG Vol. 3 until after he's completed production of "The …

JOJO RABBIT | Moustache Teaser Reaction

If Top Gun: Maverick is the most exciting teaser of late, then the teaser trailer for "Jojo Rabbit" has got to be the most bizarre. If you haven't seen it, check it out below:


Taika Waititi's latest movie is based on the book "Caging Skies" by Christine Leunens, and tells the story of Jojo "Rabbit" Betzler (Roman Griffin Davis). A member of the Hitler Youth, Jojo's world view is turned upside down when he discovers his single mother (Scarlett Johansson) is hiding a young Jewish girl in their attic. And the only person he has to turn to as he attempts to deal with all that he's going through, is his imaginary friend...Adolf Hitler (Taika Waititi).

Now I know what you're thinking; "this sounds bat shit insane!" And to be fair, you're probably right. But Jojo Rabbit looks - in true Waititi fashion - absolutely hysterical. It is definitely something you have to see to believe, and that's just the trailer. One thing fans of …