Skip to main content

1917: Average Guy Movie Review


Set during the Great War, '1917' follows the story of Lance Corporals William Schofield (George MacKay) and Tom Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman). Tasked with an important mission, the two young soldiers must cross no man's land in order to reach an advancing British battalion, and stop them from marching into a German trap. If they fail to deliver the message in time 1600 men will be slaughtered - including Blake's older brother. Time truly is the enemy in this tense and unforgiving war drama.


There aren't many movies that I would say you definitely have to see in the cinema, but '1917' is definitely one of them. Sam Mendes' tribute to his grandfather is something you really should see on the big screen. The way it's shot - like one continuous take - makes it more of an immersive experience than most other movies. There is an element of anxiety to '1917', in that you never really know what's going to happen - or more importantly, go wrong - which leaves you constantly on edge. It's almost like you're in the trenches with Blake and Schofield, you can feel the pressure they're under, the weight of the responsibility they have been given. Chapman and MacKay both deliver very genuine performances, they portray all of the emotions you'd expect a young soldier would be feeling in that situation. They also work well with the unique shooting style, as do all of the supporting cast.


Mendes was wise to focus on a couple of soldiers rather than depicting a large battle. By doing so he has personalised the story, we see the war through their eyes, and what a horror it was. The battlefields have been perfectly recreated, from the trenches to no man's land, the bunkers and the ruined towns. It's all horrifying and terrifying at the same time, even the open spaces have a sense of ominous foreboding. And all of it is beautifully brought to life by the legendary cinematographer, Roger Deakins. It's as if the movie was filmed in the actual locations. The visuals truly are flawless, and the way Deakins uses the one take style to put the audience in the middle of the action is masterful. You will feel like you are rubbing shoulders with those young men on the battlefield, rather than observing from the side lines. If they were to make another movie showing how '1917' was filmed - a camera crew following the camera crew - I would happily watch that too.


Sam Mendes' tribute to his grandfather makes for a shockingly realistic and gripping war movie, one that immerses the audience in the gruesome horrors of the Great War.

10/10


What did you think of '1917'? Leave a comment below or find us on Facebook and Twitter. You can also email us at moviemoustache@gmail.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning | Average Guy Movie Review

Two months after acquiring both halves of the cruciform key, Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) is ready to put an end to the Entity, once and for all. However, in that time the rogue A.I. has increased its stranglehold on cyber space and the planet. Spreading lies and misinformation, the people of the world are divided more than ever, and governments are on high alert. All of which should make it rather difficult, maybe even impossible for Ethan and his team to find a sunken Russian submarine and, use whatever they find there to kill the artificial intelligence that's slowly taking control of the world's nuclear arsenals. It is entirely possible that Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning  could be the most anxiety inducing instalment of the franchise - the second half, anyway. Once again, Tom Cruise puts himself through the absolutely ludicrous in the name of entertainment... and a possible adrenaline addiction. Every scenario in which Ethan and the gang find themselves seems to be d...

Jason Bourne: Spoiler Review

I don't usually write spoiler filled reviews because I don't see the point. But considering my not so positive review of Jason Bourne, one of the most highly anticipated movies of Summer 2016, I thought it might be worth trying to explain why I reached the verdict I did. If you haven't seen this movie stop reading because there are spoilers ahead. Click here to see the spoiler free review. The movie begins with Bourne in Greece. He's laying low, making money by competing in underground fights and still struggling with his past. He lacks purpose which is making him miserable. Nicky Parsons on the other hand is busy hacking the CIA in order to expose their black ops programs. So far so good. But when Nicky finds something out about Jason's (or should I say David's) past, she heads to Greece to find him. Unfortunately her activities have drawn the attention of CIA Agent Heather Lee (Alicia Vikander), a cyber ops specialist who begins to track her. Using a ...

4DX – Is it worth it or just a gimmick?

Having watched the promo video what do you think? This week I saw Ghostbusters in 4DX and it definitely made the movie more of a ride. In fact 4DX feels like it was designed to appeal to the roller coaster crowd but will you miss the experience when watching the same movies at home? When I saw Ghostbusters for the second time I decided to view it in 4DX because I wanted to know what the "environmental effects" did for the movie going experience. If you want to know what I thought of Ghostbusters check out my Average Guy Movie Review . In my honest opinion; right now 4DX is more of a gimmick than an experience. The movement, air bursts, smoke and spraying water were more of a distraction than anything else, all of which felt out of sink with the movie. The effects like the strobe lights went off a split second before whatever they were supposed to augment happened. For example; during a subway scene, the Ghostbusters find a ghost in the tunnel who had been executed u...