Skip to main content

Moonfall | Average Guy Movie Review



When the moon's orbit begins decreasing, the world is thrown into chaos. Fluctuations in gravity and extreme tidal events bring destruction on a global scale. But when it's discovered that some sort of alien technology is responsible, NASA director Jocinda Fowler (Halle Berry) must turn to disgraced astronaut Brian Harper (Patrick Wilson), the only man who has seen this tech up close, and a crackpot scientist (John Bradley) with strange theories about the moon, in order to fix the problem.



The master of disaster returns, once again, to the genre that put him on the Hollywood map. Only you'll probably wish that he hadn't. Moonfall comes across like an inferior version of his previous disaster epics. Which begs the question; why does Roland Emmerich keep falling back on the same old (and very recognisable) template? This sort of thing was getting stale when 2012 came out back in 2009! But it's all here; the (sometimes) disgraced expert and/or bad parent who will make everything better by saving the world, while their family attempts to survive the carnage - something that felt particularly unnecessary here - and the teased possible reunion of the formerly married. In fact, the writing as a whole is a tad messy. On top of some rather cringe-worthy moments featuring John Bradley's character, Moonfall is a mish-mash of moments stolen from other movies, only not done so well. The writers even stole a joke from The Lost World: Jurassic Park!



It certainly doesn’t help that thanks to the Covid-19 pandemic there was no location shooting done for this disaster... movie. In its place they used a whole lot of rather obvious studio sets, made clear by some very bad and rather overused green screen effects. Leaving the movie devoid of any sense of authenticity or believability - which admittedly does sound rather stupid in regard to a sci-fi, disaster epic, but there we are. Not only is this all rather odd given the high praise Emmerich's previous disaster epics have received for their visual effects, but it also has a habit of taking you out of the movie, especially during the big action set pieces. Even the pretty decent cast - arguably Moonfall's greatest asset - are unable to do enough with the material to distract you from the movie's issues. So ultimately it becomes more about making it to the end of the movie in order to find out what's actually going on with the moon and why it's trying to kill us, rather than actually enjoying the ride.



Some underdogs are impossible to love, and it appears that Moonfall is one of them. If it's a big, action-packed, disaster/save the world movie you're after, there are much better options out there. A couple of which were directed by Roland Emmerich.

1/10



What did you think of Moonfall? Leave a comment below or find us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. You can also email us at moviemoustache@gmail.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning | Average Guy Movie Review

Two months after acquiring both halves of the cruciform key, Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) is ready to put an end to the Entity, once and for all. However, in that time the rogue A.I. has increased its stranglehold on cyber space and the planet. Spreading lies and misinformation, the people of the world are divided more than ever, and governments are on high alert. All of which should make it rather difficult, maybe even impossible for Ethan and his team to find a sunken Russian submarine and, use whatever they find there to kill the artificial intelligence that's slowly taking control of the world's nuclear arsenals. It is entirely possible that Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning  could be the most anxiety inducing instalment of the franchise - the second half, anyway. Once again, Tom Cruise puts himself through the absolutely ludicrous in the name of entertainment... and a possible adrenaline addiction. Every scenario in which Ethan and the gang find themselves seems to be d...

Jason Bourne: Spoiler Review

I don't usually write spoiler filled reviews because I don't see the point. But considering my not so positive review of Jason Bourne, one of the most highly anticipated movies of Summer 2016, I thought it might be worth trying to explain why I reached the verdict I did. If you haven't seen this movie stop reading because there are spoilers ahead. Click here to see the spoiler free review. The movie begins with Bourne in Greece. He's laying low, making money by competing in underground fights and still struggling with his past. He lacks purpose which is making him miserable. Nicky Parsons on the other hand is busy hacking the CIA in order to expose their black ops programs. So far so good. But when Nicky finds something out about Jason's (or should I say David's) past, she heads to Greece to find him. Unfortunately her activities have drawn the attention of CIA Agent Heather Lee (Alicia Vikander), a cyber ops specialist who begins to track her. Using a ...

4DX – Is it worth it or just a gimmick?

This week I saw Ghostbusters in 4DX and it definitely made the movie more of a ride. In fact 4DX feels like it was designed to appeal to the roller coaster crowd but will you miss the experience when watching the same movies at home? When I saw Ghostbusters for the second time I decided to view it in 4DX because I wanted to know what the "environmental effects" did for the movie going experience. If you want to know what I thought of Ghostbusters check out my Average Guy Movie Review . In my honest opinion; right now 4DX is more of a gimmick than an experience. The movement, air bursts, smoke and spraying water were more of a distraction than anything else, all of which felt out of sink with the movie. The effects like the strobe lights went off a split second before whatever they were supposed to augment happened. For example; during a subway scene, the Ghostbusters find a ghost in the tunnel who had been executed using an electric chair. The ghost levitated and as...