Skip to main content

USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage: Average Guy Movie Review


In 1945 the Americans dropped the world's first atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Components and uranium for the bomb were delivered to Tinian, the island airfield where the bombers were based by the USS Indianapolis. The Indianapolis - a Portland class heavy cruiser - usually travelled with an escort of destroyers in order to protect against enemy submarines. But due to the secret nature of the mission it was decided that this journey should be completed unescorted. The journey to Tinian was completed in record time, after making their delivery they headed for Leyte. At 00:14 hours on 30th July Indianapolis was struck by two torpedoes from a Japanese submarine, she sank in twelve minutes. Approximately three hundred men went down with the ship, the rest faced dehydration, starvation, exposure and shark attacks as they awaited rescue.


If you've seen Jaws this story may sound familiar, Quint (Robert Shaw) describes the incident in detail having been a (fictional) member of the crew. Considered the worst disaster in US Naval history, the sinking resulted in what's believed to be the largest number of shark attacks on humans. As a fan of history I think this a story that definitely needs telling. How is it such a little known story considering it's a major part of the history of the atomic bomb and the end of the war?



I wish I could say that USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage does justice to the crew and their story, unfortunately it doesn't. Nicolas Cage is very good as Captain McVay, he does a great job portraying a man struggling with the loss of so many of his crew and the guilt that came with it. Tom Sizemore is also very good as Chief Petty Officer McWhorter. All of the other performances range from good to awful. Obviously the focus of the story is on their time in the water and is done very well for the most part. The delivery of the bomb components felt rushed as did the events after the rescue. A sub-plot involving two sailors and their love for the same woman felt tacked on, an unnecessary attempt to humanise the crew.


The production values aren't great either, most of the CGI is of very low quality. The battleship USS Alabama was used as a stand in for the Indianapolis, this is the same ship used in Steven Seagal's Under Siege. During the sinking you see some brilliant shots of the torpedo strikes and the ship buckling, the decks are burning and torn apart. Yet in the next shot you see men running across intact decks. While in the water, the men suffered frequent and unpredictable shark attacks, not only do the computer generated sharks look terrible but they're also the wrong sharks. In the movie they're depicted as Great Whites whereas in reality the crew were mostly attacked by Oceanic White Tip and Tiger sharks.


USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage is definitely a movie that people should see. I would encourage anyone to watch it, simply to appreciate the level of sacrifice an entire generation made for our freedom. It's a return to form for Nicolas Cage, but weak performances from some of the supporting cast and poor production values let it down.

6/10



What did you think of USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage? Let us know by leaving a comment below or find us on Facebook and Twitter.

Comments

  1. I agree with this review. I had been saying for a long time that this story needed to be told, there is another much older film I saw with my Father years ago. But this effort is just an embarrassment . The cgi looks as though it cost a fiver, especially in the opening scene. It doesn't even attempt to get its facts right , as it uses the wrong sharks, they should have been tiger sharks . Lazy and shoddy film making and cringeworthy acting which is a shame ,as it's a story that people should know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for leaving a comment, your support is always appreciated. I expected a lot more from Hollywood with this one! On the plus side, their story has been told and it's believed the movie sticks closely to historical events. It just doesn't do their story justice.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning | Average Guy Movie Review

Two months after acquiring both halves of the cruciform key, Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) is ready to put an end to the Entity, once and for all. However, in that time the rogue A.I. has increased its stranglehold on cyber space and the planet. Spreading lies and misinformation, the people of the world are divided more than ever, and governments are on high alert. All of which should make it rather difficult, maybe even impossible for Ethan and his team to find a sunken Russian submarine and, use whatever they find there to kill the artificial intelligence that's slowly taking control of the world's nuclear arsenals. It is entirely possible that Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning  could be the most anxiety inducing instalment of the franchise - the second half, anyway. Once again, Tom Cruise puts himself through the absolutely ludicrous in the name of entertainment... and a possible adrenaline addiction. Every scenario in which Ethan and the gang find themselves seems to be d...

Jason Bourne: Spoiler Review

I don't usually write spoiler filled reviews because I don't see the point. But considering my not so positive review of Jason Bourne, one of the most highly anticipated movies of Summer 2016, I thought it might be worth trying to explain why I reached the verdict I did. If you haven't seen this movie stop reading because there are spoilers ahead. Click here to see the spoiler free review. The movie begins with Bourne in Greece. He's laying low, making money by competing in underground fights and still struggling with his past. He lacks purpose which is making him miserable. Nicky Parsons on the other hand is busy hacking the CIA in order to expose their black ops programs. So far so good. But when Nicky finds something out about Jason's (or should I say David's) past, she heads to Greece to find him. Unfortunately her activities have drawn the attention of CIA Agent Heather Lee (Alicia Vikander), a cyber ops specialist who begins to track her. Using a ...

4DX – Is it worth it or just a gimmick?

Having watched the promo video what do you think? This week I saw Ghostbusters in 4DX and it definitely made the movie more of a ride. In fact 4DX feels like it was designed to appeal to the roller coaster crowd but will you miss the experience when watching the same movies at home? When I saw Ghostbusters for the second time I decided to view it in 4DX because I wanted to know what the "environmental effects" did for the movie going experience. If you want to know what I thought of Ghostbusters check out my Average Guy Movie Review . In my honest opinion; right now 4DX is more of a gimmick than an experience. The movement, air bursts, smoke and spraying water were more of a distraction than anything else, all of which felt out of sink with the movie. The effects like the strobe lights went off a split second before whatever they were supposed to augment happened. For example; during a subway scene, the Ghostbusters find a ghost in the tunnel who had been executed u...